🛰️Ishe Samuels-Smith : Modular Defender

Posted by

·

A few notes on left backs, fullback national development and lefties

A few notes on Ishe Samuels-Smith

  • Clustering lefties, and left backs

  • Ishe Samuels-Smith, Modular defender in 2025

    • DEFENDING

    • ATTACKING

  • The European Left Back landscape

  • Renato Veiga, who?

  • Ishe Samuels-Smith, as first seen in 2022-23

Some notes on player development, and fullbacks in particular.


Having coached a few good players over the years, including two who are now professionals that I poached in Grassroots to jump at National level (with great success).

Competing for the same spot in the same team in the same season, and I could fit them in the same team to play off the park the rival club 9v11 in September 2020.

Bob the Squad Builder

Winning 7/7 tackles in the first half vs the best team in Western France for his debut at National level on opening day.

I thought Nantes would snatch him at half time (they want him now anyway)

Or Lens to replace Khusanov.

Clustering fullbacks

Fullbacks: is your country developping players

I am of the opinion that fullbacks is the real truther to evaluate a National curriculum of player development.

From the BIG BEN article ; England have a position specific curriculum.

France are taking chances, don’t really develop players, and fuck about with strikers converted at left back.

Lucas Digne is the only one with the entire toolkit (heading, crossing, defending, passing) and even academy curriculum.

From December 2022.

Maverick unicorns and alien are drawn from the GPS Lottery that makes a Mbappé see the light in Bondy, Haaland in Manchester or Bellingham in Birmingham. Let’s not get drawn into the pseudo science of how to manufacture athletes; which is a combination of genetics (height, fast twich fibers, and a variety of biological parameters) and upbringing

I remember doing a BSc research project, which was a 100+ people questionnaire about sport trying to investigate the relationship between playing sports and parents’ interest / involvement in it. I think one of the takeaways was that having parents who played at high level obviously helps from a networking perspective of access to opportunity, but the most interesting one (for what it’s worth) was that parents who played the sport at a half decent level find themselves in the sweet spot between understanding the dynamics, and not putting too much pressure.

Back to our fullback business, they are hardly the players who win you games growing up through the Academy age groups. The large majority of professional players played striker or midfielder (and finished games at CB, you know the jazz) for being better than their age peers and winning games when they felt like it.

Matchwinners at academy levels are usually the big city mavericks who can find unexpected solutions to new problems (that’s creativity) or be relentless in order to force a breakthrough (that’s problem-solving).

Ian Maatsen (22): solving problems

Life, in general, is about opportunities but not everyone has access to the same

On top of that and independently, not everyone perceives them the same way.

“Affordances” coined by Gibson in the 1970s is how someone views a locked door, and how someone finds their way in through the window. Do you see obstacles or solutions.

There’s two ways to nurture and develop people’s ability to face adversity.

  • Give them the solution (and a good life), that’s why very few middle/upper class sportsmen succeed in open access sport (Tennis, Golf, F1 and anything that costs an arm isn’t an open access sport)

  • Identify talent pools full of a demographic that has to find solutions to get on top of the number of age peers competing for the same chance; and finding a way through

  • Developping players through making them face a library of commonly encountered problems, to give them a toolbox of solutions.

This is the latter that interests us; even if eventually, the second will be at play for better clubs to sign players who worked on their craft.

Nature versus nurture. Not everything is god given, but not everything can be taught.

Developping players will rely on

  • Game realistic demands that align with the reality of senior football the closer you get to it

  • Game realistic training and player development to provide the practices that allow players to develop their skills and decision making associated.

Whatever his name (it’s not the point). The Angers U19 left back, French U19 Champion looked the part (have you heard dis and dat), now plays 5th tier French football.

Dembo, my idiosyncratic right back on wheels, is now a professional (and international) – a long journey coming from that quick winger “not good enough” and “wouldn’t think he made it” by your local sunday league local football experts.

Ultimately, looks get you places in football, output and outstanding abilities make you break the ceiling (and clubs put money on you).

Nobody grows up dreaming to becoming a Gary Neville

Coined by Jamie Carragher, “you’re either a failed winger, or a failed centre back”

Speaking of coins, this is a cookie cutter, or “coin sorter” framework

In other words, what you might be able to work around. This isn’t capturing 100% of the pool of converted players into fullbacks, there’s also central midfielders like Malo Gusto.

There’ll be players who get a “yes” in some categories, but it’s generally accepted that if you’re tall and brave you’re a CB whilst quick and dynamic end up at fullback; until they either improve or are released.

The overlap of both (brave and quick) is Wesley Fofana, meaning world’s best.
Same for “tall and ground defending”, we’re talking Rüdiger.

Lefty vs Righty

Producing top level fullbacks stem from: identifying players that fit the bill, and developping their key attributes.

Doing it for right backs is difficult, and the real evidence that a player talent pathway isn’t just “play quick kids upfront and at the back” and “dribbling ones in midfield” but answers to a specific role description.

Just like at any school or field of work. A bullet point of ability that players can or can’t do.

Doing it for left backs is all the more difficult because you’re looking at the 10 to 12% of the (global) population that use their left limbs predominantly.

There’s of course the case of people who are dissociated and write with the right and shoot with the left. And Ousmane Dembélé

The left and right side of the brain

Silver lining for lefties, even if the evidence isn’t directly conclusive.

The brain is cross-wired, meaning that the right side controls the left side of the body and vice versa.

Scientists at the University of Oxford say that the brains of left-handed people work differently than right-handed people.

In a study, the brain was monitored in left-handed participants. Scientists say the two sides of the brain were better connected in lefties and more co-ordinated, particularly in the areas that involve using language.

Chris McManus, from University College London, author of the book Right Hand, Left Hand says:

“If you are left-handed you might find yourself with a slightly unusual way your brain is organised and suddenly that gives you skills that other people don’t have.”

It’s often claimed that left-handed people are more likely to be creative and good at art or music. However there is not enough scientific evidence to prove this so far.

Scientific evidence isn’t overly conclusive to expect any left footed to be overly gifted.

But it’s commonly accepted in football scouting that

  • A right footed player can develop a good left foot to be equally capable with both. John Terry, Fikayo Tomori and Marc GuĂ©hi are evidence that hard work comes to fruition

  • A left footed player will have it easier to get a beter strong foot (left) than a righty would ever dream of. Colwill, Badiashile (welcome to the penitentiary, Jhon Duran) are good examples

In other words, if you have a good lefty; you get hold of them.

Chelsea’s Left Back avenue: Boulevard of Broken Dreams?

Over the years, Chelsea had a number of players featuring for their Academy age groups on the left side of innovative 343 systems (that pre-date Antonio Conte’s arrival) as you can read about here:

that made them dominate FAYC (6 wins in a decade) and UEFA Youth League (3 finals, two successes)

For the left back position; the common theme is that Chelsea was usually seeking for external talent to join their ranks. This is the hopefully exhaustive alumni of Cobham / Chelsea Academy left backs. Some of them signed after U15 U16.

  • Ben Gordon

  • Patrick Van Aanholt

  • Nathan Ake

  • Aziz Deen Conteh

  • Kevin Wright

  • Juan Familia Castillo

  • Miro Murheim

  • Ian Maatsen

  • Jay Da Silva

  • Dylan Williams

  • Zak Sturge

  • Ishe Samuels-Smith

  • Somto Boniface

The four dutchmen (PVA, Ake, Castillo, Maatsen) include three very fast counter attacking fullbacks, coming from behind the ball with a bit of a shot and finish about them. And Nathan Aké, that Benitez and Conte liked (albeit gave him one start and one appearance overall in half a season, called back in 2017)

Aké and Da Silva signed at 13-15 from Feyenoord and Luton made the backpages

Williams, Sturge were domestic opportunities signed from Derby County and Brighton respectively mostly to reinforce the Development Squad and will probably navigate in the football league for a few years. Miro Murheim was signed from Swizerland

Chelsea “produced” produced Somto Boniface who joined as U9 and Kevin Wright, Aziz Deen Conteh and Lewis Hall a central midfielder by trade, given a debut by Thomas Tuchel aged 17

The other theme was that Chelsea was often playing right footers at left back in recent years: Brodi Hughes, Silko Thomas, Zain Silcott-Duberry, Derrick Abu, Henry Lawrence and the best of the lot Ola Aina – set to qualify for the Champions League (or more) with Nottingham Forest Castoffs.

All “inverting” before it was cool, receiving, crossing or finishing from the left.